SEWAGE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT
GRI 306-1, 306-2
Total water discharge by quality and destination in 2018−2019 (GRI 306-1) | ||||
Wastewater
|
2019
|
2018
|
||
PGNiG Group
|
PGNiG
|
PGNiG Group
|
PGNiG
|
|
Domestic [‘000 m3]
|
396.4
|
0.3
|
370.1
|
0.3
|
Municipal [‘000 m3]
|
97.2
|
83.9
|
116.9
|
89.2
|
Industrial [‘000 m3]
|
8,816.0
|
10.2
|
8,471.2
|
10.9
|
Other [‘000 m3]
|
135,765.6
|
18.5
|
151,760.1
|
17.6
|
Wastewater generated by the PGNiG Group companies is discharged into the sewage system, surface water or soil based on the water permits obtained. Domestic and industrial wastewater is discharged into the sewage system. Rainwater from plant premises and access roads is discharged into the municipal sewage system, as well as into surface water and soil.
The PGNiG TERMIKA Group companies account for a large share in the volume of generated wastewater as they use water for cooling purposes. The policy of economical water management is followed during drilling work and, where possible, wastewater is reused to prepare drilling muds.
PGNiG GHPB reported higher volumes of domestic wastewater from sanitary facilities on drilling rigs as well as higher volumes of rainwater and meltwater removed from drilling rigs, which is due to the drilling of deeper wells and longer time of rig operation.
Water recycled and reused
In 2019, Geofizyka Toruń rolled out internal reorganisation measures as part of maintenance of the company’s wastewater collectors infrastructure, raising employees’ awareness of the importance of saving water and reducing the volume of sewage.
In and around the Mogilno UGSF and Kosakowo UGSF operated by GSP, an environmental monitoring project was carried out in order to identify possible impacts related to the discharge of salt brine (classified as an effluent) into the Puck Bay in the case of the Kosakowo CUGSF and operation of the onshore part of the project in the case of the Kosakowo UGSF and Mogilno UGSF. The results of the environmental monitoring indicate that construction and operation of underground gas storage facilities has no adverse effect on individual components of the natural environment.
Waste management methods used at the PGNiG Group in 2018−2019 (GRI 306-2) | ||||||||
Other waste excluding municipal waste
|
Recovered
|
Disposed of [Mg]
|
Landfilled [Mg]
|
|||||
Recycled [Mg]
|
Other recovery processes [Mg]
|
|||||||
2019 |
||||||||
Hazardous waste
|
PGNiG Group
|
119.7
|
306.9
|
3726.1
|
-
|
|||
PGNiG
|
44.5
|
112.2
|
708.2
|
-
|
||||
Non-hazardous waste
|
PGNiG Group
|
1,600.7
|
675,732.1
|
3,834.5
|
171.9
|
|||
PGNiG
|
123.8
|
383.6
|
3,002.2
|
171.9
|
||||
2018 |
||||||||
Hazardous waste
|
PGNiG Group
|
111.1
|
229.4
|
1,404.9
|
-
|
|||
PGNiG
|
40.9
|
88.9
|
504.1
|
-
|
||||
Non-hazardous waste
|
PGNiG Group
|
639.1
|
506,622.2
|
4,261.9
|
200.0
|
|||
PGNiG
|
10.8
|
353.9
|
3,660.8
|
200.0
|
Method of drilling waste management in 2018–2019 (GRI 306-2) | |||||||
Drilling waste
|
|
Stored in waste disposal facilities [Mg]
|
Recovered [Mg]
|
Disposed of [Mg]
|
Reused [Mg]
|
Stored [Mg]
|
Stored in rock mass [Mg]
|
2019 |
|||||||
Hazardous waste
|
PGNiG Group
|
-
|
2,380.4
|
25.9
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
PGNiG
|
-
|
2,380.4
|
25.9
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Non-hazardous waste
|
PGNiG Group
|
748.1
|
85,840.4
|
20,814.1
|
-
|
990.6
|
11,139.5
|
PGNiG
|
-
|
81,191.2
|
10,660.5
|
-
|
149.1
|
11,139.5
|
|
2018 |
|||||||
Hazardous waste
|
PGNiG Group
|
-
|
1,189.2
|
1,134.2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
PGNiG
|
-
|
1,189.2
|
499.3
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Non-hazardous waste
|
PGNiG Group
|
1,884.6
|
66,833.6
|
7,902.9
|
-
|
120.9
|
6,092.4
|
PGNiG
|
|
54,622.3
|
7,871.7
|
-
|
120.9
|
6,092.4
|